menubar

mainmenu

Events Calendar

<<  June 2013  >>
 Mo  Tu  We  Th  Fr  Sa  Su 
       1  2
  3  4  5  6  7  8  9
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Members Login



Forest and Mountain Biodiversity: Trends PDF Print E-mail

Table of Contents

It is estimated that from 2000 to 2005, the Philippines lost 2.1% of its forest every year, the second fastest in Southeast Asia (next to Myanmar) and the seventh in the world (Echanove, 2008). The rapid and alarming loss of (natural) forest cover is attributed to pressures from commercial exploitation of forests and population increase, including lifestyle and consumption patterns that put much strain on resources. Citing a study done by the Environmental Science for Social Change (ESSC), Haribon Foundation explains that the further decline of the remaining 18.3% forest cover in 1999 could be arrested with purposive and massive forest regeneration programs that could result to a significant increase to 19% by 2010; otherwise, forest cover could slip to a mere 6% around the same period as shown in Figure 2.

 

Figure 2.  Forest loss in the 20th century.

map_forest

Source: Key Conservation Sites in the Philippines (Haribon and Birdlife International, 2001), citing ESSC booklet, “Decline of the Philippine Forest”


A joint undertaking of the DENR-Forest Management Bureau (FMB) and the National Mapping and Resource Information Authority (NAMRIA) in 2003 estimated forest cover at 7.168 million hectares or 23.89% of the total land area. This includes 2.47 million hectares of closed forest, 4.28 million hectares of open forest and 297,160 hectares of forest plantation. Of the identified forest covers, 6.432 million hectares (89.73%) are within forest lands while 0.737 million hectares (10.28%) are within alienable and disposable (A&D) lands (Figure 3). The forest plantations may have significantly contributed to the increase in forest cover, however, they are not seen to provide the appropriate habitat for indigenous species.

 

forest-cover

 

 

forest-cover2
Figure 3. Forest cover in A&D land and forestlands (Philippine Forestry Statistics 2003)

 

Although the figures on plantation cover are incomplete, the current programs aiming to address livelihood and production needs (e.g., the National Clonal Forestry Program) point to increase in plantation forests. The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and EcoGov2 (2008), using land satellite imagery, noted that in Mindanao, there has been a decline in natural forest cover by at least 40,000 hectares per year. An increase in tree plantation cover by an average of 70,000 hectares per year in this area was observed, and could possibly mirror a national trend.

In 2006, the Philippine biodiversity conservation priorities were reinforced with the identification of terrestrial Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) using data from Important Bird Areas (IBAs) identified by the Haribon Foundation and Birdlife International, the 2004 International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources now the World Conservation Union (IUCN) Red List, as well as point locality data from published literature, experts and scientists, and museum collections.  A total of 128 terrestrial KBAs have been identified for 209 globally threatened and 419 endemic species of freshwater fishes, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals, and 62 congregatory bird species. An interesting analysis by DENR shows that PAs cover only 51% of the priority sites identified under the Philippine Biodiversity Conservation Priority Setting Program (PBCPSP), 44% of the IBAs, and 35% of terrestrial KBAs.  In other words, PAs cover less than half of the priority biodiversity sites identified through scientific studies, and there are many PAs that are not considered strategic for biodiversity conservation. The current implementation thrust of DENR is to reconcile KBAs with the legally-protected sites.  Conservation International or CI (undated) has also cited 5 Alliance for Zero Extinction sites from these KBAs which should be considered to be given highest protection priorities (Figure 4). These include Siburan, Mt. Mantalingajan, South and North Gigante Island, Mt. Kambinlio and Mt. Redondo.

 

kbas
Figure 4. Percentage of Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) and Alliance for Zero Extinction (AZE) sites under
some form of legal protection, 1996-2006 (CI Brochure on Biodiversity Outcomes Monitoring, undated).

 

The importance of identifying and establishing KBAs and IBAs is supported by new species discovered in the past 5 years. These new discoveries include the Calayan rail (Galirallus calayanensis), Camiguin hanging parrot (Loriculus camiguinensis), Philippine forest mouse (Apomys camiguinensis) and Rafflesia mira.